Trained ability
Matrix reasoning
Spotting the pattern in a grid, then working out which piece is missing.
Most brain trainers give you one exercise and a score that only goes up. This one gives you fourteen, across memory, reasoning and speed — and five tests you never practise, so the progress you see is your own.
No account. No ads. Works offline.
記憶kioku
Holding several things in your head and keeping them current while more keeps arriving.
論理ronri
Working out what follows from what you know, and stopping there.
速度sokudo
Taking in more of what's in front of you, in less time.
Every exercise finds your level in the first few minutes, then moves with you as you improve. You are never bored, and never drowning.
You get told the truth about your own progress.
Most apps test you on the game you just played, so the number always rises — whether or not anything underneath it did. Here, training and testing are kept completely apart. Five tests you never practise, at a difficulty that never changes, taken before you start and again after each real stretch of training. So the trend you are looking at is about you, not about how good you have got at one particular game.
We built the most complete trainer we knew how to build, and then built the instruments to check whether it actually works. You get both — and the second one is the rare part.
Plenty of people who train seriously say it changed something real for them. The controlled trials mostly haven't managed to show it — though most of them ran a few weeks, on students with no reason to push. The honest answer is that it's unresolved, and anyone selling you certainty either way is selling you something.
So we did the useful thing instead of the loud one: we built the measuring instruments into the app and handed them to you. Take the tests before you start, train, take them again, and read your own before-and-after. You'll get better at these exercises — that part is certain. Whether it reaches further is something you'll be able to see for yourself.
The part nothing else in this category has.
Four of them measure the kind of thinking the training goes after: spotting a pattern in a grid, working out what comes next in a sequence, holding several facts in your head at once, and remembering under pressure. The difficulty never changes, and you never practise them.
Trained ability
Spotting the pattern in a grid, then working out which piece is missing.
Trained ability
Five shapes in a row, each following a rule. Work out what the sixth one has to be.
Trained ability
Holding several facts in your head at once and working out what they add up to.
Trained ability
Remembering a sequence while something else keeps interrupting you.
Imagining an object turned around. We deliberately don't train this one.
If it climbs as much as the other four, then you didn't get better at reasoning. You got better at taking tests. Most apps would rather you never found that out.
Why we picked an ability we're least likely to improve →Every problem is built fresh each time, so there's nothing to memorise, and each family closes a different shortcut.
Hold, update, compare — under time pressure.
One skill, many relations — each family is its own ladder.
Less time, more of the field.
Why it keeps working.
01
There is no level to pick and nothing to set up. The app finds a difficulty you can just about hold — right at the edge of comfortable — and keeps nudging it as you improve. Beginners and old hands get the same treatment.
02
A second program solves each puzzle before you see it. If more than one answer holds up, the puzzle is thrown away and rebuilt. Every wrong answer is provably wrong, not just different from the one we had in mind.
03
Difficulty here is not one slider. Twenty-three separate things can get harder — how much you hold, how fast it arrives, how convincing the wrong answers are — and only one or two move in any session. A trick that carried you last week quietly stops working.
Every session ends with a number, and with the arithmetic written out underneath: how many you got right, what pure guessing would have scored on that exercise, how far up you climbed from one to the other, and the multiplier for the difficulty you played at. You can check it on a calculator, and we think you should be able to.
It’s a game score and it says so. It isn’t a measurement of you — that’s what the five tests are for, and we keep the two apart on purpose.
There’s also a self-check in Settings, which reads your own stored sessions and tells you whether the machinery is doing its job: whether the difficulty really climbs when you clear 85%, whether it’s mixing up the exercises and the dials, whether interruptions are being spotted, and when your next test is due. It reads and never writes, so running it can’t change anything. Where it hasn’t got enough data yet, it says so rather than showing you a reassuring tick.
Training is hard, and hard things need more than willpower. So there is real encouragement here — and every piece of it is something you actually did.
Applause when you level up. Not for showing up, and not for a streak: for the difficulty genuinely rising because you cleared the band. There is a rarer version when an exercise goes further than you have ever taken it, and it says so differently, because that one means more.
A streak that forgives you. One missed day inside any seven does not end it. A rule that deletes six weeks over one bad Tuesday is not motivating, it is just unkind. The skipped day is not added to the count either — it bridges the run rather than padding it, so the number stays honest.
One reminder a day, if you want one. At a time you choose. Never a second one, silent on a day you have already trained, and it switches itself off after a fortnight of being ignored. Nothing in it about losing anything — it is off until you ask for it.
A picture of how far you have come. This is the one people are most surprised by. Because the app holds you near 80% correct forever, every session feels exactly as hard as your first, and your own improvement is invisible from the inside. So each exercise shows the distance travelled in plain units: you began holding 2 back. You now hold 5.
And the folding. 鍛錬 is a metalworking word — heat the steel, hammer it, fold it back on itself, repeat. Every fold doubles the layers, and ten folds is the thousand-layer figure smiths quote. Here a fold costs two hours of real training, so the metal deepens over months. It cannot be hurried, opening the app earns nothing, and it ends at ten. Then there is just the training.
On your phone. There is no account, nothing to sign up for, and the app works with the aeroplane mode on — which is also the honest way to try it, since nothing about your history depends on us.
Export it as JSON whenever you like. Back it up encrypted through your phone’s own file picker, no cloud account needed. On Android it backs up by itself as you train, keeps the last five, and tells you loudly if it ever stops.
Online features — a leaderboard, and pairing up with someone else training — are being built. When they arrive they will be optional, and what they send is written down in the privacy policy before either one goes live.
8 min
An automated audit measures how much each surface feature of a problem reveals about its answer, and fails the build past 0.05 bits. It has caught five real leaks — including one that printed the answer on the item.
6 min
Dual n-back gives you a single difficulty knob and a single metric. Matching a relation rather than an item changes what the task demands — a structure to update instead of a list to hold.
The tests are in the app. Take them before you start, then take them again in a month.